Comparison Method Violates Its General Contract. Any suggestion / help will be much appreciated. Since a > b and b > c, then it must be the case that a > c.
Comparison method violates its general. If you have x = null, y = 1, z = 2, your implementation of null equals anything, means: #6 mistermel, nov 5, 2017.
It's Rather Nice Of The Library To Detect This And Let You Know, Rather Than Behave.
This violates the contract and hence throws the exception. Your implementation fails to meet that part of the contract. Although this is now technically solved, i would like to know what caused it, in case this happens again or someone else has the same problem.
Hello Experts, We Are Facing Strange Issue While Updating Or Modifying Existing Ico ( Sap Pi7.40 Single Stack).
Let a be the parent of b, and b be the parent of c. Comparison method violates its general contract occurs when the comparison method is not clearly defined when implementing the comparator interface, and a stack trace log similar to the one below is output. Comparison method violates its general contract.
If You Have X = Null, Y = 1, Z = 2, Your Implementation Of Null Equals Anything, Means:
Bug something doesn't work as it was intended to. Open comparison method violates its general contract! Closed samabcde opened this issue sep 28, 2021 · 1 comment closed
I Did Ask That A Known Issue Be Published For Number 1363878, Which Is The Fix For The System Error:
Comparison method violates its general contract! Open flaltangyi opened this issue jun 22, 2022 · 1 comment. I suspect the problem occurs when neither value is sponsored.
As A Temp Fix, I Had To Create A New Project Folder And Move All The Artifacts To The New One.
From sbs to enterprise customers. However, if your comparator is invoked on a and c, it would return zero, meaning a == c. Comparison method violates its general contract!